| Vet Surg.
2003 Jul-Aug;32(4):390-401.
Hamstring graft technique for
stabilization of canine cranial cruciate ligament deficient stifles.
Lopez MJ, Markel MD, Kalscheur V, Lu Y,
Manley PA.
Comparative Orthopaedic Research
Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin,
Madison, WI.
OBJECTIVE-To investigate the harvest
and application of hamstring grafts for canine cranial cruciate ligament
(CrCL) reconstruction.
STUDY DESIGN-Experimental study.
ANIMALS-Four adult female hounds,
weighing 26.3 +/- 1.6 kg (mean +/- SEM).
METHODS-One stifle in each dog was
randomly chosen for hamstring graft CrCL reconstruction after native
CrCL transection. Arthroscopy was performed to evaluate graft integrity
at 12 weeks. Gait analysis and stifle radiographs were performed
preoperatively and up to 52 weeks after graft placement. Dogs were
killed 12 (n = 2) or 52 weeks (n = 2) after CrCL reconstruction. Tissues
were evaluated grossly and with light and confocal laser microscopy.
RESULTS-Hamstring grafts were intact in
all stifles at 12 weeks (n = 4) and 52 weeks (n = 2). Grossly, there was
no osteoarthritis in stifles at 12 weeks and only chondrophytes along
the trochlear ridges at 52 weeks. Minimal radiographic evidence of
osteoarthritis developed in stifles with grafts during the study.
Lameness in limbs with grafts resolved by 52 weeks. Graft tissue was
highly vascular, ligamentized, and undergoing active remodeling at 12
weeks. Fifty-two weeks after graft placement, intraarticular graft
tissue was well vascularized, mature, and encapsulated by synovium, and
graft-bone interfaces were characterized by Sharpey's fiber insertions.
There was no evidence of graft necrosis using confocal laser microscopy
at either time point.
CONCLUSIONS-The hamstring graft
technique may be a viable method of canine CrCL reconstruction. CLINICAL
RELEVANCE-Hamstring grafts may be an alternative technique for canine
CrCL reconstruction. Further study is needed before clinical
application.
|